Computer Software Training - Virtually

When you attend training, what do you get? Well,convincing on the trainees' part), along with a hefty
what you paid for, of course. But what if you find that'token' fee.
you have paid for the wrong track? Or you found thatWhat really counts, is that attendees learn something
the course is too easy for you? How easy is it forout of the course. That their understanding of the
you to switch to another course then? Do you have toapplication increases. That they can make use of the
wait for a few days? Weeks? Or indefinitely? Do youapplication in the field - when they have to produce
have to tolerate all that basic stuff till near the end ofsomething, and have the confidence to assert that the
the course duration and get what you came for? Canapplication can do this and that; or that some things are
you ask the instructor to skip topics when the rest ofout of the application scope. Right? So that is why I
the class seems to be junior at it? Is the trainer willingadvocate flexible, practical, targeted online training that
to give you more than what is beyond the paid coursegive the participants control over their learning or
contents? Just how much more? Do you have toneeds.
worry about sitting for tests at the end of the lessonHere are what I find appealing about virtual training:
that seem to test your language more than your skills?1. Participants can sample tutorials before deciding.
Wait! Does that classroom air-condition temperature2. Participants can repeat lessons as often as they
seem perpetually freezing? Or like in the oven?wish.
Why do I raise these issues? The simple answer is -3. Participants can pause the instructor at their own
they are the constant frustrations of classroom trainingcomfort.
attendees I hear time and time again. Chances are,4. Participants can take the course where and when
you faced some or all of these issues yourself.they are most comfortable.
Software trainers with some years of experience5. Participants can switch to a course that is more
report the feedback on course structure, targetedsuitable for them anytime.
content and administrative ease, contain these6. Participants can follow their own pace, not the pace
disappointing remarks. It is true that flexibility, targetedof the slowest or fastest learner in class.
contents and practicality play significant roles on the7. Participants can take ONLY the topics that they
impact of the entire course - not just the experiencerequire, not those they already know.
and proficiency of the trainer. And there is the test or8. Participants can access all other possible topics
examination factor. For many of these attendees whowhen they need them. These should include popular
came for knowledge, the test or exam factor actuallysoftware titles like Microsoft Office, Macromedia Flash,
shortchanged them of course hours, more hands-onDreamweaver, Adobe Photoshop and technical
and a conducive learning atmosphere. Adding on,courses like MCSE, MCSA, CCNA, CompTIA A+ (for
some examination systems seem to take an eternityPC technologies) and Network+.
to log on to, owing to server delays, network traffic or9. If the participants themselves are trainers, it is a
bad programming. In short, participants do not get thegood, fast, quick and reliable way to revise topics
satisfaction and objective they hoped for. It is abefore that BIG delivery day.
one-size-fits-all solution with limited or no repeat10. If participants have an URGENT crash course need,
broadcast. Refresher sessions a few months downit is within their reach.
the road are virtually non-existent. Or it comes with aAnd, importantly too, it should not burn a hole in their
reluctant 'yes' on the provider's part (after muchpockets where affordability is concerned.