Social Efficiency versus Democratic Equality

Larabee describes social efficiency as an educationalparents, the community at large, and the students
framework in which the school sees its role as that ofcome into play. Certain questions emerge as important:
preparing the students to become workers. CurriculumWhat responsibility do teachers have toward their
responds to society's needs in a pragmatic manner;students in terms of pushing them towards a type of
hence, it is seen as a public good designed to meeteducation that does not coincide with the the student's
collective needs. Society depends on the school tosocial background? How motivated should a teacher
meet its human capital needs in all phases ofbe to push certain students toward more advanced
economic life. In this model, schools must necessarilyclasses? How inclined should a teacher feel or feel
adapt to existing socioeconomic and social structures.impelled to make available certain types of information
While maintaining the status quo, they realize their fullthat may permanently and favorably alter the student's
educational, political, and cultural impact.future? Which students get pushed toward a more
Society has the responsibility of enhancing productivityvocational education? Which ones get steered toward
in all phases of life. This means that schools musta more academic program?
seriously prepare students of all levels, for all levels.The position that principals, guidance staff, the
However, some very interesting assumptions arecommunity, etc. take depends on their philosophical
taken for granted. It is implicit that all societal positionsstance. If these educators are operating from a social
are not equitable. The objective of social efficiency isefficiency perspective, they may not very well
not to elevate or demote people socioeconomically, orconsider themselves immoral, or unethical for choosing
socially. It is the overall, collective benefit of the publicnot to inform students of certain channels leading to
that is being served. Hence, schools are induced topositions that would enhance their lifestyle. They may
replicate, with unerring accuracy, society's hierarchicalfeel that as long as they equip the students with the
form and complete structure. Tasks in the societytools to help them fill positions like those held by their
need to be done by everyone. So it is everybody'sparents, they are fulfilling their obligation to their
place to contribute and do what needs to be done forcharges.
the public good.Joel Spring describes the type of community in which
To get this model to work, certain institutions had to bethe labor market does not depend on a high level of
artificially contrived. Tracking, on the basis of perceivededucation. He refers to these communities as inert.
abilities and preferences, vocationalism, ability testing,The primary consideration of educators with regard to
educational standards, and other forms of stratificationinert communities is to provide the best possible basic
were all instituted with one aim. They separatededucation to students to fill just these needs.
students into different groups to fill different societalApparently, many schools adopt the social efficiency
roles. Many of the roles were based on society'smodel for their students of color. This model is also
historical perceptions of which groups of people shouldbeing used in several African American and Hispanic
be performing what tasks, or on actual abilities andcommunities which have come to expect that their
talents the students possess. Hence, the questionmembers will hold only certain types of menial
came down to whose children should be educated forpositions, simply because that is what they have
what roles in society. People upholding the socialalways held. Hence, only certain professional
efficiency ideology can be perceived as blockingexpectations are developed and enmeshed within the
chances for social mobility and political equality.community. Moreover, the dominant community overtly
As said earlier, social efficiency is not designed to alterand covertly expect that members of the subjected
the status quo of society members. In other words,community will continue to hold those positions.
children of the elite will not be trained to fill societalNotions about what roles members in these societies
roles not already consistent with their status. Nor willwill hold are reinforced and maintained by teachers
children of people working in menial positions beresponding to stereotypes about the quality of thinking,
expected to be trained for those held by the elite.work ethic, disposition, etc. of minority students.
These would be taught vocational skills for differentTeachers can also make deliberate efforts to maintain
array of jobs, and would be channeled directly intothe status quo of students' potential social positions
these jobs. In this sense, education can be seen as athrough their attitudes and behaviors, overt and covert.
duplication of what already exists. The education isThese behaviors and attitudes reinforce within
designed to predict working class job roles for workingstudents self-defeating ideas and help them enliven
students and to prepare them so precisely as toself fulfilling prophecies.
render all other options impossible. Some would seeDefining or understanding concepts such as social
this as not being unfair since it does not rob those whoefficiency and democratic equality is relatively easy.
already have nothing. What specific groups hadBeing in a position of educator and knowing how to
previously is what they continue to have. Society'sact fairly towards students depends on the educator's
needs are met, and things continue to run as theyembraced philosophy and sense of fairness and
always have.responsibility towards all students.
But not so, some say. Democratic equality must prevail.Larabee, D. Public goods, private goods: the American
It must be interpreted to mean equal access to allstruggle over educational goals. American Educational
students for all possible positions. Here as everywhereResearch Journal. Spring 1997, vol. 34, No. 1, pp.
else, the philosophical framework of educators,